Dismissed

M/s. Avalon cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. v. The commissioner of customs

Madras HC10 Apr 2017WP/8405/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Customs Commissioner to consider a representation regarding the rectification of an incorrect notification quoted in an appellate order. The Court issued a one-week notice for this purpose before disposal.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding rectification of a mistake within four weeks.

M/s. Avalon cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. Vs The commissioner of… — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.8405 of 2017

¶6

M/s.Avalon Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.,

¶7

Rep. By its Authorised Signatory, No.3, Level-2, Centrium,

¶8

Phoenix Market City, 15, LBS Marg, Kurla, Mumbai 400 070. .. Petitioner

¶9

The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II), No.60, Rajaji Salai, Custom House,

¶10

Chennai 600 001. .. Respondent

¶11

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2016.

¶12

For Petitioner: Mr.Adithya Reddy

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.S.R.Sundar

¶14

Standing counsel

¶15

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2016, wherein and whereby they wanted the rectification of mistake with reference to a notification referred to in the order passed by the appellate authority.

¶16

2.Heard both sides.

¶17

3.According to the petitioner, a wrong notification has been quoted in the said order, which has to be corrected by quoting the right notification, as stated in the representation. Needless to say that it is for the respondent to consider such request and pass orders accordingly. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of, by directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.10.2016 and pass

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

orders on the same on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶20

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS III )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II),
No.60, Rajaji Salai,
Custom House,
Chennai 600 001.
+1 cc to Mr.Adithya reddy,advocate,sr.21403
+1 cc to mr.S.R.Sundar,sr.21859.
kj(co)
krd 19/4
W.P.No.8405 of 2017

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. Avalon cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. v. The commissioner of customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Avalon cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. v. The commissioner of customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.S.R.Cartons India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The General Manager

M/s.Home Finders Housing Ltd. Vs The Income Tax Officer

Chennai Local Lorry owners Vs The Secretary

T.K.Rajalakshmi Vs The Deputy Commissioner of

M/s.Softech Infinium Solutions Vs The Principal Commissioner

Ashok Leyland Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner