Disposed

M.Shanmugalakshmi, v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC5 Sept 2017WP/8192/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought a writ of Mandamus directing government officials to act on applications for compassionate appointment. The court directed the Deputy Commissioner to consider specific representations and pass orders within 12 weeks before disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed 4th respondent to consider representations and pass orders within 12 weeks.

M.Shanmugalakshmi, Vs The Secretary to… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.8192 of 2016

¶6

M.Shanmugalakshmi ... Petitioner

¶7

The Secretary to Government

¶8

Commercial Tax Department,

¶9

Fort, St.George,

¶10

Chennai 600 009.

¶11

The Joint Commissioner (CT) Enforcement-I, Commercial Tax Department,

¶12

Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶13

The Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai South Division, Commercial Tax Department, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶14

The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Enforcement (North) Commercial Tax Department,

¶15

Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶16

The Assistant Commissioner (CT)

¶17

Puzhal Check Post,

¶18

Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. ... Respondents

¶19

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's application dated 30.09.2009 & 24.02.2010 and the reminder dated 25.01.2016 within the time stipulated.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thirumavalavan

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai Additional Government Pleader(Taxes)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to direct the respondents to consider on the representations submitted by petitioner on 30.09.2009, 24.02.2010 and the reminder dated 25.01.2016 and pass orders .

¶25

2.The writ petitioner has submitted a representation in relation to her compassionate appointment based on the fact that her father was relieved from service on medical invalidation. The father of the writ petitioner was medically invalidated and therefore the writ petitioner is eligible to submit her application for compassionate appointment.

¶26

3.In this regard, the father of the writ petitioner also made a representation on 30.09.2009. In spite of the repeated representation the respondents have not taken any action in this regard.

¶27

In this view of the matter the 4th respondents is directed to consider the representations submitted by the writ petitioner on 30.09.2009 and 24.02.2010 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

5.Accordingly, the writ petition stands dispose of. However, there is no order as to costs.

¶29

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS V )

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

tkp/maya

The Secretatary to Government Commercial Tax Department, Fort, St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

The Joint Commissioner (CT) Enforcement-I, Commercial Tax Department, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶37

The Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai South Division, Commercial Tax Department, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶38

The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Enforcement (North) Commercial Tax Department, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. 5. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Puzhal Check Post, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. +1cc to Mr.S.Thirumavalavan, Advocate Sr. 64385 W.P.No.8192 of 2016

¶39

AR(V) VR(09/10/2017)

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Shanmugalakshmi, v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Shanmugalakshmi, v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.G.Bala Subramanian Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Mr.S.a.Anbazhagan Vs District collector

R.Gokulakannan Vs The Government of

D.Hemalatha Vs The District Employment

N.Shanmugam, Vs Deputy Registrar of

V.Umarani, Assistant, Vs The District Collector