Mr.Nayeem, v. State Rep. by :
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for release of auto rickshaws was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner withdrew the petition; it was dismissed accordingly.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 16.02.2017 Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.No.8179 of 2014
1 Nayeen [ PETITIONER ]
Vs 1. State rep by The Inspector of Police, D-1, Triplicane Police Station, Triplicane, Chennai. 2.Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South East, Mandavalli, Chennai. 3.The Commissioner/State Transport Authority, Transport Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5. [ RESPONDENTS ] Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 2-3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2014 and release the petitioner's auto rickshaw bearing Registration No.TN 04 AC 8528 and release the petitioner's auto rickshaw bearing Registration No.TN 04 AC 8528.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thirumaran For Respondents: Mr.S.Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement to the effect that he is withdrawing this writ petition. Recording the endorsement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
-s/d-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nayeen
- respondent
State rep by The Inspector of Police
- respondent
Regional Transport Officer
- respondent
The Commissioner/State Transport Authority
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court