Disposed

Tvl.a.Mohammed Sowban v. The Deputy Commercial Tax

Madras HC5 Apr 2017WP/8045/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an assessment order. It directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act on merits within four weeks without taking coercive steps.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act and pass orders on merits within four weeks without taking coercive steps.

Tvl.a.Mohammed Sowban Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:05.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

W.P.No.8045 of 2017

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P.No.8797 of 2017

¶8

Tvl.A.Mohammed Sowban Proprietor of Humdaan Shoes No.4, Orasala Alauddin Street,

Ambur – 635 802.

... Petitioner

vs.

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,

¶13

Office of the Assistant Commissioner (CT),

¶14

Ambur – Vellore District. ... Respondent

¶15

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order to call for the records of the respondent dated 21.12.2016 in TIN 33154264129/2015-16.

¶16

For Petitioner : Adithya Reddy

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.K.Venkatesh, Government Advocate.

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent and by consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶20

The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of assessment dated 21.12.2016. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the assessment, based on the Web Report was not passed after following the procedures and guidelines issued by this court in its recent decision reported in W.P.No.105/2016 etc. dated 01.03.2017.

¶21

Though it is contended so, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the petitioner has not chosen to file a reply to the show cause notice since the petitioner

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

was unwell at the relevant point of time and was undergoing medical treatment. He further submitted that the petitioner has made an application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act on 13.02.2017 in person followed by sending the same through registered post on 23.03.2017 seeking for rectification. Therefore, he contended that the respondent may be directed to consider the said application and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law.

¶24

Learned Government Advocate submitted that the said application filed by the petitioner will be considered and orders will be passed on its own merits and in accordance with law within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶25

Considering the above stated facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the petitioner has already approached the respondent by way of filing an application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, it is for the respondent to consider such application and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law. It is open to the petitioner to raise all the contentions before the respondent at the time of hearing the said application. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Such exercise shall be done by the respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the respondent is directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

Sd/Asst.Registrar (J) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar

¶27

vsi To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Office of the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Ambur – Vellore District. +1cc to Special Government Pleader (Taxes)sr.20585 +1cc to Mr.Adithya Reddy sr.20299

¶28

W.P.No.8045 of 2017

¶29

sv1(co) ss(13/4/2017)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tvl.a.Mohammed Sowban v. The Deputy Commercial Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl.a.Mohammed Sowban v. The Deputy Commercial Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Audiophile India Vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Stanpacks (India) Ltd., rep. b Vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

K.S.Rangasamy College of Arts Vs The Secretary

Sirmax Engineering India P Ltd. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Esab India Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner

M/s.Danly (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner