S.Balamurugan, v. The Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed this writ petition filed under Article 226 as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw and filing an endorsement to that effect.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHNDRABAABU
Writ Petition No.7425 of 2017
and WMP.No.8080 of 2017
S.Balamurugan ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Collector
Chennai District
Chennai.
2.Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC)
Rep. By the Managing Director
“Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai”
Gandhi-Irwin Road, Egmore,
Chennai-600 008. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing
the 2 nd respondent from closing the TASMAC shop No.701 and bar
situated at No.45/85, Cross Street, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai-
600 032.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jegannath
For Respondents : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali,
Government Advocate, for R1
Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan
Standing Counsel, for R2
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
- In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Balamurugan
- respondent
The Collector Chennai District
- respondent
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court