The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking maintenance of a specific road and sanctioning of a plan. The court noted compliance regarding house obstruction orders and directed parties to finalize land compensation within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.02.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.6714 of 2016
Dr.Nasreen Ahmed ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Member Secretary
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Gandhi Irwin Road
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2. The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Ripon Buildings
Chennai – 600 003.
3. The Chief Planner
Multi Storied Building (MSB)
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Gandhi Irwin Road
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
4. The Deputy Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
(Parks and Play Field – OSR)
Ripon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003.
5. The Superintendent Engineer
In-Charge of Open Space Reservation and Parks
Corporation of Chennai
Ripon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003.
6. Binny Limited
rep. by its Managing Director
No.1, Cooks Road, Otteri
Perambur, Chennai – 600 012.
7. Landmark Barracks Projects Pvt. Ltd.
rep. by its Managing Director, T.Udayakumar
No.27, Saravana Street
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 5 herein to maintain the 20 Feet Width Road x around 160 Feet Length running from North to South (Barracks Lane New Colony Road, Perambur Barracks Road, Chennai – 600 012) as shown in Plan and Earmarked RED in colour should remain as ROAD without any interruptions or constructions without obstructions of any kind for ingress and egress from Corporation Road called Binny Lane and further directing respondents 1 and 2 to sanction plan in conformity with orders passed by this Court in C.S. No.72 of 2014 dated 5.2.2014 in regard to the 20 Feet Width Road x around 160 Feet Length Road running from North to South (Barracks Lane New Colony Road, Perambur Barracks Road, Chennai – 12) in respect of the application made by respondents 6 and 7 relating to the project “Landmark Barracks Project Pvt. Ltd.”.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.L.Sudarsanam
For Respondents : Mr.N.Sampath
for respondents 1 and 3
Mr.K.Soundararajan
for respondents 2, 4 and 5
Mr.Sanjay Kumar
for respondents 6 and 7
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The order dated 12.1.2017 is stated to have been complied with insofar as the obstruction of the house of the petitioner is concerned and shall be maintained so.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To:
W.P.No.6714 of 2016
KJ(CO) CA(13/02/2017)
Dr. Nasreen Ahmed
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Corporation of Chennai
Landmark Barracks Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
M Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
