M.v.Raajah, v. The Commissioner cum Estate
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed Writ Petitions challenging eviction notices, holding they do not survive as the Appellate Authority allowed the petitioner to proceed afresh. Liberty given to appear before the enquiry.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to appear before the enquiry and put forth his case. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.Nos.5024 to 5026 of 2017 and WMP Nos.5293 to 5295 of 2017
M.V.Raajah ...Petitioner in all W.Ps. Vs.
- The Commissioner cum Estate Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai - 600 003.
- The Assistant Commissioner, Revenue and Finance, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai - 600 003.
- The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai - 600 003. ...Respondents in all W.Ps.
Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records from the file of the 3rd respondent made in DN.53 dated 4.2.2017 and 24.2.2017 issued in respect of the premises at D.No.9(9A), D.No.8(9A &9) and D.No.2, Dr.Vijayaragavalu Road, Old Washermanpet, Chennai - 600 021, respectively and quash the same and further direct the respondents to grant license to the petitioners as per the representation dated 10.09.2015.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions survive given that the petitioner has been allowed liberty to proceed afresh by the Appellate Authority.
What relief is available regarding the impugned notices issued under the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.V. Raajah
- respondent
Commissioner cum Estate Officer, Corporation of Chennai
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner, Revenue and Finance, Corporation of Chennai
- respondent
Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court