P.Parthiphan, (Driver 2443), v. The Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought terminal benefits and back wages via a writ petition. Respondent counsel undertook to settle the dues within four weeks. The High Court held that no further adjudication was required and closed the writ petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; terminal benefits and balance back wages to be settled within four weeks of order receipt.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.09.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.5005 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.5263 of 2017
P.Parthiphan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, (Tamil Nadu Division No.1) Ltd., Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to pay the petitioner his back wages from 01.04.1993 to 31.03.2008, the Provident Fund, commuted value of pension and gratuity and the arrears of monthly pension from 01.04.2008 till date with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. From till the date of payment and award costs.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ayyathurai
For Respondent : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Parthiphan
- respondent
The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, (Tamil Nadu Division No.1) Ltd.
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court