Allowed

A.Peer Mohamed v. The Secretary

Madras HC7 Sept 2017WP/459/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner seeking pension and terminal benefits was not served a relieving order post-retirement. Court directed the college and Directorate to process the petitioner's representation within six weeks and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

First respondent directed to consider representation submitted on 23.12.2015 and pass orders within six weeks from receipt of the copy of this order.

A.Peer Mohamed Vs The Secretary — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :07.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.459 of 2016

¶6

A. Peer Mohamad .. Petitioner
vs
1.The Secretary,
S.I.V.E.T. College,
Gowriwakkam, Chennai – 600 073.
2.The Director,
Directorate of Collegiate Education,
College Road, Chennai-6.
3.The Joint Director,
Directorate of Collegiate Education,
Saidapet, Chennai-15. .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction, directing the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 23.12.2015 within a specified period.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr. M. Ravi For Respondents : No Appearance for R1 : Mr.K. Dhananjayan,

¶9

Spl. Government Pleader for R2 & R3

¶10

O R D E R The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 23.12.2015, in relation to the settlement of his terminal and pensionary benefits.

¶11

The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner made a submission that the writ petitioner was holding the post of Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Corporate

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Secretaryship with the first respondent-College and retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.11.2015. However, the relieving order has not been served to the writ petitioner and the terminal and retirement benefits have also not been paid.

¶14

The learned Special Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3, made a submission that the first respondent-College has to submit a proposal for sanctioning the pension and other benefits to the writ petitioner and thereafter, the authorities have to consider the same. However, it is not clear whether the College has submitted the proposal for sanctioning the terminal and retirement benefits to the writ petitioner.

¶15

Thus, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 23.12.2015 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CCC)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
rpl
To

¶17

The Director, Directorate of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai-6.

¶18

The Joint Director, Directorate of Collegiate Education, Saidapet, Chennai-15.

¶19

The Secretary, S.I.V.E.T. College, Gowriwakkam, Chennai – 600 073.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

- 1 cc to Mr. M. Ravi, Advocate,SR.65384

¶22

- 1 cc to M/s.K.Shakespeare, Advocate,SR.65084

¶23

- 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, SR.65616

W.P.No. 459 of 2016

SS(CO)

NR 04/10/2017

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Peer Mohamed v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Peer Mohamed v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Joshua Gnanapalam Vs The Director of School

N. Devaraj Vs Murugesan

A Jayalakshmi Vs Mrs D Sabitha IAS

S.Venkatachalapathy, Vs The Managing Director

A.Arulraj Vs The Secretary to Government

A.Selvam, S/o.v.Anandan Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu