Allowed

C.Thamizh Maran, v. The Inspector General of

Madras HC19 Jan 2017WP/42855/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed respondents to return specific registration documents to the petitioner. It mandated endorsements indicating pending 47-A proceedings, creation of a government charge on unpaid stamp duty, and updates to encumbrance certificates, following a prior judgment.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to return documents No.14748, 14749, 14750 with necessary endorsements regarding pendency under Section 47-A.

C.Thamizh Maran, Vs The Inspector General of — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 19.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No. 42855 of 2016

¶6

C.Thamizh Maran S/o.Late Ko.Chenguttuvan, No.9 Somasundram Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. ... Petitioner Vs 1 The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai. 2 The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) Collectorate, V Floor, M.Singaravelan Maligai, 32 Rajaji Salai, Chennai- 600 001 3 The Sub Registrar Thiruporur Sub Registrar Office, Thiruporur ... Respondents

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 & 3 to return the documents No.14748, 14749 & 14750 registered on 01.12.2015 on the file of 3rd respondent to the petitioner by considering his representations dated 18.03.2016 and 29.04.2016.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajeswaran

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

Petitioner has come up with the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to return the documents No.14748, 14749 & 14750 registered on 01.12.2015 on the file of 3rd respondent and also to consider

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

the petitioner's representation.

¶13

There are cateena of decisions of this Court pertaining to return of documents and the learned counsel for the petitioner also produced one such order of this Court in W.P.No.32313 of 2013 dated 09.01.2013 and would submit that the petitioner is also similarly placed with that of others.

¶14

Following the order of this Court more particularly, paragraph 7 of the said judgment which is usefully extracted hereunder, this writ petition is also disposed of. No costs.

¶15

Paragraph 7 of W.P.No.32313 of 2013 would read thus:

¶16

7.Accordingly, the respondent is directed to return the sale deed dated 25.9.2013, registered as Document No.11296 of 2013, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the following conditions:

¶17

"i) The Registering Authority while releasing the documents, shall make necessary endorsement on the original document to the effect that the proceedings under section 47A of the Act are pending.

¶18

ii) The Registering Authority shall make necessary entries in the register maintained regarding the pendency of 47-A proceedings in respect of the documents subject matter of the registration so as to reflect the same in the Encumbrance Certificate for the benefit of the purchasers.

¶19

iii) Pending final decision in respect of the valuation under section 47-A(i), as per Section 47-A(4), there shall be a charge over the properties in favour of the Government in respect of the unpaid value of the stamp duty.

¶20

iv) After the entire proceedings under section 47-A are completed, on production of the original documents by the petitioner, the Registering Authority shall make necessary endorsement removing the earlier endorsement clearly stating that the entire amount of stamp duty under the documents have been paid in full and return the same.

¶21

v) After such endorsement, the Registering Authority shall make necessary entry of the completion of 47-A proceedings

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

in the register maintained by them so as to reflect the same in the Encumbrance Certificate."

¶24

Further, the respondent is at liberty to finalise the proceedings initiated under section 47 A of the said Act, as expeditiously as possible.

¶25

Smi

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

1 The Inspector General of Registration
Office of the Inspector General of Registration
Santhome High Road,
Santhome, Chennai.

¶30

2 The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) Collectorate, V Floor, M.Singaravelan Maligai, 32 Rajaji Salai, Chennai- 600 001

¶31

3 The Sub Registrar Thiruporur Sub Registrar Office, Thiruporur.

¶32

+1cc to Mr.R. Marudhachalamurthy, Advocate, S.R.No.4039 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.4098

¶33

AD(CO)

¶34

md(23/02/2017)

¶35

W.P.No. 42855 of 2016

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Thamizh Maran, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Thamizh Maran, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Harimurugesan Vs The Commissioner

M/s.Sree Saraswathi Mills Ltd. Vs The Tahsildar

R.Sundaramoorthy Vs The District Collector

T.Ramanathan, Vs The Secretary

Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga Vs Commissioner of Labour

P.Selvakumar Vs The District Collector