Disposed

Ravi v. The District Collector

Madras HC6 Jan 2017WP/417/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court bench disposed of multiple writ petitions seeking quashing of eviction orders under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001. Court accepted respondents' submission to treat notices as Section 28(2) notices and permitted petitioners to file replies within one week.

What did the court decide?

Notices treated under Section 28(2) of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act; petitioners allowed one week to file reply.

Ravi Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶7

W.P.Nos.417 to 428 of 2017

¶8

Ravi ... Petitioner in W.P.417 of 2017 Sundhara ... Petitioner in W.P.418 of 2017 Kannagi ... Petitioner in W.P.419 of 2017 Kasiammal ... Petitioner in W.P.420 of 2017 Shanthi ... Petitioner in W.P.421 of 2017 Moorthy ... Petitioner in W.P.422 of 2017 Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P.423 of 2017 Priya ... Petitioner in W.P.424 of 2017 Rani ... Petitioner in W.P.425 of 2017 Selvi ... Petitioner in W.P.426 of 2017 Rajambal ... Petitioner in W.P.427 of 2017 Alli ... Petitioner in W.P.428 of 2017

¶9

¶10

1. The District Collector Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The Thasildar Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District.

¶11

The Divisional Engineer No.214, Dindivanam Road, Navakarai, Thiruvannamalai Town Thiruvannamalai District.

¶12

The Assistant Engineer Highways Dept - Construction & Maintenance - South Zone, No.214, Dindivanam Road Navakarai, Thiruvannamalai Town Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents in all W.Ps

¶13

Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

W.P.No.417 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.27/2 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶16

W.P.No.418 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.28 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶17

W.P.No.419 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.28 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶18

W.P.No.420 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.66 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶19

W.P.No.421 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.28 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶20

W.P.No.422 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.27/2 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶23

W.P.No.423 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.27/2 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶24

W.P.No.424 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.66 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶25

W.P.No.425 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.28 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶26

W.P.No.426 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.28 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶27

W.P.No.427 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.66 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶28

W.P.No.428 of 2017 : Calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned order bearing reference of Order

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

No.7/2016/U.Po/dated 22.12.2016 passed by the 4th respondent herein quash the same as unconstitutional and against the law of natural justice and consequentially forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner without following due process of law in respect of the petitioner's property located at Survey No.27/2 in Kilanaikkarai Village, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶31

For Petitioners : Mr.A.K.Rajaraman
For Respondents : Mr.M.K.Subramanian
Government Pleader
for respondents 1 to 4
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The learned Government Pleader states that the impugned
notices may be treated as notices under Section 28(2) of the
Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 and the petitioners may file reply
to the said notice within one week from today, whereafter
appropriate orders will be passed by the authorities concerned.
2. The aforesaid statement is taken on record and the
petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently,
W.M.P.Nos.437 to 460 of 2017 are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To:
1.The District Collector
Thiruvannamalai
Thiruvannamalai District.
2.The Thasildar
Thiruvannamalai
Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Divisional Engineer
No.214, Dindivanam Road,
Navakarai, Thiruvannamalai Town
Thiruvannamalai District.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

4.The Assistant Engineer Highways Dept - Construction & Maintenance - South Zone, No.214, Dindivanam Road Navakarai, Thiruvannamalai Town Thiruvannamalai District.

¶34

+12cc's to Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, Advocate, S.R.Nos.1292 to 1303 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.2052

¶35

W.P.Nos.417 to 428 of 2017

¶36

SCD(CO)
CA(20/01/2017)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ravi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Lakshmanan Vs The Director

B.Murali Vs The Commissioner

Dr.(Mrs) Mala Parameswaran Vs the Member Secretary

Tamil Nadu Centre for Public Vs Union of India

The Asst. General Manager Vs S.Ragu

Moorthy Vs The District Collector