Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of a certificate regarding land under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act. At hearing, it was submitted that the petitioner had died. The writ petition was dismissed as abated.
Writ petition dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 09.10.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.35054 of 2003
Pathimuthu .... Petitioner
Vs
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certioirarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Na.Ka.A2/5565/87 dated 19.05.1994 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same and further directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders by virtue of the TamilNadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Amendment Act 20 of 1999 in respect of the land in survey No.508/2, Keezha Veera Raghavapuram Village, Palayamkottai Taulk. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesh Government Advocate O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is no more. The same representation was made on 03.08.2017. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. No costs.
pvs
sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/TRUE COPY/
SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
W.P.No.35054 of 2003
KS[CO]
MK:22/11/2017
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pathimuthu
The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005
The Competent Authority and Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling, Tirunelveli
S. Vaidyanathan J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
