This Writ Petition seeking a loan was dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance and failure to file representation when listed for dismissal.
No loan; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.02.2017 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P. No.3486 of 2011
Elumalai .. Petitioner Vs. The State Bank of India, rep. by its Branch Manager, Santhavasal Branch, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. .. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's loan proposal and to direct the respondent to give agricultural loan to the petitioner. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : M/s.Ramalingam Associates O R D E R On 02.02.2017, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the case on 06.02.2017, under the caption "for dismissal''. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar avr
To
The Manager The State Bank of India, Santhavasal Branch, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.
+1 cc to M/s.Ramalingam & Associates sr 8076
W.P. No.3486 of 2011
rsl(co)
aa01/03/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Elumalai
The State Bank of India
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
