The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a rejection order. It directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for appointment as Telugu Pandit within eight weeks.
The second respondent directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.11.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.33751 of 2014
K.Manjula ..Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep. By its Secretary to Government
School Education Department
Fort St.George, Chennai -9.
2.The Chairman
Teachers Recruitment Board
College Road, Chennai 6.
3.The Professional & Executive Employment Office
Santhome, Kamaraj Salai,
Chennai 4. rep. By its Director
..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent pertaining to his proceedings in R.C.No.8713/A3/LC/2012 and quash the order dated 7.4.2014, and consequently direct the 1 st and 2 nd respondents to appoint the petitioner to the post of Telugu Pandit in the existing vacancy of the year 2010-11.
2
For Petitioner :Mr.R.Sivakumar
For Respondents :Mr.A.Raja Perumal -R1 & R2 Government Advocate
No appearance - R3 * * * * *
O R D E R
The writ petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition challenging the order dated 07.04.2014, passed by the second respondent in and by which her claim for appointment to the post of Telugu Pandit was rejected
2.The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner
submitted that the name of the writ petitioner was sponsored by the Employment Exchange in proceedings dated 17.09.2014, pursuant to
the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.31451 of 2012 dated 19.02.2014. Thereafter, the petitioner also submitted a representation on 28.10.2014, requesting the Teachers Recruitment
Board to consider her name for appointment to the post of Telugu Pandit, based on the sponsoring letter of the Employment Exchange dated 17.09.2014. Further, the learned counsel submits that the said post of Telugu Pandit is still vacant and yet to be filled up.
3
3.Under such circumstances, without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner dated 28.10. 2014 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to submit the copy of the representation along with all the relevant documents and the order passed today (03.11.2017) in this writ petition.
The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.
03.11.2017
rpa
To
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep. By its Secretary to Government
School Education Department
Fort St.George, Chennai -9.
2.The Chairman
Teachers Recruitment Board
College Road, Chennai 6.
3.The Professional & Executive Employment Office
Santhome, Kamaraj Salai,
Chennai 4. rep. By its Director
4
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,
rpa
W.P.No.33751 of 2014
03.11.2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation for appointment to the post of Telugu Pandit.
Whether the petitioner will be granted a time limit to submit the representation copy after the disposal of the writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Manjula
Government of Tamil Nadu
Teachers Recruitment Board
Professional & Executive Employment Office
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
