The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition challenging police interference with property rights due to the petitioner's default in appearing on the scheduled hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.30657 of 2004
S.Duraivelu
Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, M.K.B.Nagar, Vyasarpadi, Chennai 600 039 .. Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent and the subordinates, from interfering with the petitioner's property right and personal rights, and forcing the petitioner to execute sale deed pursuant to the sale agreement dated 10.10.2003 and payment of any amount or order direction.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Prosecutor ORDER When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing on 03.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 04.08.2017 (today). Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS VI) /true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
sts
To:
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, M.K.B.Nagar, Vyasarpadi, Chennai 600 039
+1cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.56558
Order in W.P.No.30657 of 2004
SKS(CO) NR 31/08/2017
S. Duraivelu
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, M.K.B.Nagar
S. VAIDYANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
