Writ petition filed seeking mandamus to pass orders on a representation was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on the listed date.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.08.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P. NO.3011 OF 2015
R.Rojibai ...Petitioner
Vs
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Perumal Government Advocate ORDER
When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 01.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be posted on 02.08.2017, under the caption 'for dismissal'.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cgi/sli
To.
W.P. No.3011 of 2015
AR(CS V)
CS/21/08/17
R.Rojibai
The State of Tamil Nadu
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
