V.Sujatha, v. The State Rep by its
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition by a borrower under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 challenging a recovery notice. Court disposed of the petition and vacated interim stay upon counsel submitting that the loan amount was discharged.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.02.2017 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.P.No.29829 of 2016 and WMP No.25828 of 2016 V.Sujatha .. Petitioner
versus
The State rep. By its
1. The District Collector
Thiruvallur District,
Thiruvallur.
2. The Tahsildar,
Thiruvottiyur,
Thiruvallur District.
3. The Authorised Officer
Federal Bank Ltd
Old No.52 New No.107
Armenian Street,
Chennai 600 001. .. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice issued by the first respondent in R.C.No.12419/2016/M2, 27/6/2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 29/7/2016.
For petitioner : Mr.N.Kalaiarasan for Mr.M.Gnanasekar For respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappiah (for R1 & R2) Spl. Government Pleader. Mr.A.V.Radhakrishnan (for R3) ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)
Being aggrieved by the order made by the District Collector, Tiruvallur dated 27.06.2016, passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the borrower has filed the instant writ petition praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the said order and to consider the representation dated
29.07.2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sujatha
- respondent
District Collector, Thiruvallur
- respondent
Tahsildar, Thiruvottiyur
- respondent
Federal Bank Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court