Writ petitions filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of labour court orders were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
Withdrawal of writ petitions; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :15.11.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.29267 & 29268 of 2013
and
MP.1 of 2013
Prayer:
Writ Petition No.29267 of 2013 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to I.D.No.17 of 2008 on the file of the I Additional Labour Court, Chennai, the first respondent herein, quash the award passed therein dated 17 June 2009.
Writ Petition No.29268 of 2013 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to I.A.No.482 of 2013 in I.D.No.17 of 2008 on the file of the I Additional Labour Court, Chennai, the first respondent herein, quash the order passed therein dated 14 September 2013.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Vasuvenkat
The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mk
To
The Presiding Officer
I Additional Labour Court
Chennai-600 104.
W.P.Nos.29267 & 29268 of 2013
KJ(CO)
EU 7.12.17
The Management of Argus Cosmetics Ltd & Ors.
The Presiding Officer I Additional Labour Court Chennai
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
