pass final orders on the recommendation of the 3rd respondent Institute, dated 29.11.2004, in accordance with law and the relevant rules within the time framed by this Court. If at all, the case of the petitioners was accepted by this Court, in the earlier round of litigation itself, there would have been a specific direction from this Court to regularize their service from the date of initial appointment itself. In the absence of any such direction and also in view of the fact that the 3rd respondent Institute has recommended only to regularize these petitioners, the Government, after taking into account the direction issued by this Court as well as the recommendation made by the 3rd respondent, has decided to regularise the services of the petitioners. It is to show that prior to this regularization, there was no sanctioned post available at the 3rd respondent Institute to accommodate the petitioners and that is the reason why they had been appointed only as a daily wage basis and they had been working in that capacity, till they get regularization. Therefore, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the present decision taken by the Government, through the impugned order, giving regularisation to the petitioners, is only pursuant to the direction issued by this Court as well as the recommendation made by the 3rd respondent Institute through his letter dated 29.11.2004. That is the reason why the time scale of pay has not been fixed on the petitioners and once the time scale of pay is fixed afresh, the same shall be taken effect only from the date of issuance of the Government order, that is why the prospective regularization has been given to the petitioners. Therefore, the learned Government Advocate would submit that, the orders impugned are not required to be interfered by this court.
