Dismissed

M/s.Matha Steels, v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC16 Nov 2017WP/29243/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a registered dealer under Tamil Nadu VAT Act and CST Act seeking direction to provide manual or online 'C' form. Court disposed of petition on admission stage, directing respondent to consider the representation on merits and pass a speaking order within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 16.10.2017 on merits and pass a speaking order within three weeks.

M/s.Matha Steels, Vs The Assistant Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.11.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Writ Petition No.29243 of 2017

¶6

M/s.Matha Steels

¶7

Rep.by its Proprietrix–C.T.Reena

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner(CT) Oppannakkara Street Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District. ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent arrange to provide manual 'C' form or enable the petitioner to generate online 'C' form as per the petitioner's letter dated 16.10.2017 and pass orders.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Prasanna kumar For Respondent : Mr. K.Venkatesh GA

¶12

Heard Mr.J.Prasanna kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepting notice on behalf of the respondent. In the light of the limited relief sought for in the writ petition, with the consent on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, has approached this Court by way of this writ petition, seeking for the direction upon the respondent to provide manual 'C' form to enable the petitioner to generate online 'C' form as per the petitioner's representation dated 16.10.2017.

¶14

3.Since the writ petition is disposed on the admission stage itself, no positive direction as sought for can be granted. However, it would suffice to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation on merits.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.10.2017 on merits and in accordance with law, pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of a receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar
smn
To
The Assistant Commissioner(CT)
Oppannakkara Street Assessment Circle,
Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.
+ 1 cc to M/s. R. Hemalatha, Advocate Sr.81633
+ 1 cc to Mr the Special Government pleader sr.81633
Writ Petition No.29243 of 2017
PPA(CO)
EU(23/11/2017 )

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Matha Steels, v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Matha Steels, v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Thangavelu Vs The Commissioner

Syed Anvarullah Husainy Vs The General Manager

S. Mahadevan Vs The Secretary

M/s.Sabari Electricals, Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Syed Shah Samruddin Vs The General Manager (Retail

M/s.Carboline (India) Pvt. Vs The Assistant Commissioner