This order dismisses a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a possession notice issued under the SARFAESI Act. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or file representations when the matter was listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 5/10/2017
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Writ Petition No.28862 of 2004 R.H.Sakunthala ... Petitioner Vs The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank Sowcarpet Branch Sowcarpet Chennai 600 079. ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of certiorari to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned possession notice of the respondent dated 7/9/2004 made under Section 13 (4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and quash the same as null and void.
Guarantor has challenged possession notice, dated 7/9/2004, issued under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mvs.
W.P.No.28862 of 2004
Rmp(30/10/17)
R.H. Sakunthala
The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank Sowcarpet Branch
S. Manikumar
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
