Disposed

C.N.R.Harini, v. The Controller of

Madras HC11 May 2017WP/2885/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directs the Controller of Examinations of Pondicherry University to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2017 regarding revaluation and grace marks for General Medicine Practical, citing a Division Bench judgment on similar facts, and disposes of the writ petition without deciding merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 01.02.2017 and pass appropriate orders on merits within three weeks.

C.N.R.Harini, Vs The Controller of — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.05.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P. No. 2885 of 2017 &

¶6

W.M.P. No. 2797 of 2017

¶7

C.N.R. Harini ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Controller of Examinations,
Pondicherry University,
R.V. Nagar, Chinnakalapet,
Puducherry – 14,
Puducherry State.
2. The Principal,
Sri Venkateswara Medical College
and Research Centre,
13.A, Pondy Villupuram Main Road,
Ariyur,
Puducherry – 605 102
Puducherry State. ..Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus to pass an order of direction in General Medicine Practical in Registration No. 12770443 on the file of first respondent and revalue the said subject by awarding grace marks by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.02.2017 to declare her pass in General Medicine by issuing statement of marks in the examination held on November, 2016, to secure the ends of justice.

¶9

This writ petition is filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to pass orders in General Medicine Practical, in respect of Registration No. 12770443 on the file of first respondent and revalue the said subject by awarding grace marks by considering the representation of the

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

petitioner dated 01.02.2017 to declare her pass in General Medicine by issuing statement of marks in the examination held on November, 2016.

¶12

Mr.R. Sankarasubbu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the judgment dated 11.04.2017 of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in W.A. Nos. 325 to 333 of 2017, in similar circumstances, would squarely apply to the facts of this case. However, he would further submit that it is suffice if a direction is issued to the 1^st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.02.2017, in this regard and pass appropriate orders.

¶13

Though a larger relief is sought, in view of the submission now made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, for consideration of the representation of the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the 1^st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.02.2017, in the light of the judgment dated 11.04.2017 of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in W.A. Nos. 325 to 333 of 2017, especially, paragraph No.11, and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Connected W.M.P. is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Controller of Examinations, Pondicherry University, R.V. Nagar, Chinnakalapet, Puducherry – 14, Puducherry State. 2. The Principal, Sri Venkateswara Medical College and Research Centre, 13.A, Pondy Villupuram Main Road, Ariyur, Puducherry – 605 102 Puducherry State. +2 CC to Mr.R. Sankarasubbu, sr 37283 W.P. No. 2885 of 2017 sp/12/5

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.N.R.Harini, v. The Controller of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.N.R.Harini, v. The Controller of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl. Sri Lakshmi Traders, Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

C. Ponnappan, Vs State Rep. by

Tvl.Lakshmi Glass Works Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

Debts of Mr.Nbs Rao Vs

Will of N.v.Krishnan Vs Jayashree Krishnan

N.Suravel Vs The Inspector of Police