The High Court of Madras dismissed Writ Petition No. 28227 of 2013 for non-prosecution. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus requesting police protection and safeguarding life, but appeared for neither appearance nor respondent during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.28227 of 2013
P.Muthukumaran
.. Petitioner
Versus
Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to give police protection to the petitioner based on the complaint / representation, dated 02.08.2013 and save the petitioner life.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Navaneethan, AGP
When the matter came up for hearing on 16.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Muthukumaran
Director General of Police, State of Tamilnadu
Inspector General of Police, North Zone
Deputy General Inspector of Police, Villupuram Range
District Superintendent of Police, Villupuram
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gingee
D. Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
