Petitioner sought writ of mandamus to include his name in the Tahsildar list. Writ Petition was dismissed in the High Court due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.10.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.28179 of 2004
M.Annadurai ..Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep. By The Secretary to Government
Revenue Department, Secretariat
Chennai.
2.The Special Commissioner and
Commissioner for Revenue Administration
Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
3.The District Collector
Erode District, Erode. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to include his name in 1998 list of Tahsildar at S.No.8 above his junior Mr.Natarajan whose name is found at S.No.9, by revising the list of Deputy Collector for the year 2002-2003 at appropriate place as per Rule 22 9d) of the Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules with all consequential service and monetary benefits.
For Petitioners ..No appearnce For Respondents ..Mr.K.Thanga Pandi Adl.Govt.Pleader
2
rpa
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,
O R D E R
When the Writ Petition was listed for hearing on 20.10.2017, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today (26.10.2017) also when the matter was called, none appeared for the writ petitioner.
2.In the light of the fact that there is no appearance on behalf
of the petitioner, it is evident that the petitioner is not willing to get
along with the matter and therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for
non prosecution. No costs.
26.10.2017
rpa
To
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep. By The Secretary to Government
Revenue Department, Secretariat
Chennai.
2.The Special Commissioner and
Commissioner for Revenue Administration
Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
3.The District Collector
Erode District, Erode.
W.P.No. 28179 of 2004
M. Annadurai
The Government of Tamil Nadu
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
