Dismissed

Dr.S.Karthikeyan v. the Principal Secretary to

Madras HC2 Jan 2017WP/27411/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Petition seeking quashing of an order regarding a promoted post, granting permission to the petitioner to withdraw the petition as he had already retired from service by the date of the order.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Dr.S.Karthikeyan Vs the Principal Secretary to — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶5

W.P.No.27411 of 2013

¶6

and

¶7

M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 and 1 of 2015

¶8

Dr.S.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner

¶9

..vs..

¶10

The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director of Collegiate Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-6. .. Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceeding of the impugned order passed by the 1^st respondent in G.O.(D) No.174, Higher Education (F1) Department, dated 17.09.2013 and quash the same and consequently, allow the petitioner to continue in the promoted post of Principal Grade-II based on the order of the 1^st respondent issued in G.O. (1D) No.297, Higher Education (F1) Department, dated 11.10.2012 with consequential benefits.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, Government Advocate

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition since the petitioner has already retired from service as Principal as on 31.05.2016 and hence, nothing survives in the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Recording the same, permission is granted to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶18

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
tsi
To
1. The Principal Secretary to Government,
Higher Education Department,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai-9.
2. The Director of Collegiate Education,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai-6.
+1cc to Mr.G.Sankaran, Advocate Sr.No.347.
+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.No.438.
W.P.No.27411 of 2013
KSJ(CO)
GN(30/01/2017)

¶19

02.01.2017

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.S.Karthikeyan v. the Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.S.Karthikeyan v. the Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sennappan Vs The Tasildhar

M/S. Nikita Traders, Vs the Commissioner of Customs

Mrs.Clara Vs Director General of Police

Amit Kumar Agarwal Vs District Revenue Officer

Chattramal Baid Vs District Revenue Officer

P.Rangasamy, President, Vs the District Collector