Disposed

K.R.Shivaa Kumar v. State rep. by Secretary to

Madras HC3 Feb 2017WP/2663/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition directed respondent authorities to dispose of a representation regarding unauthorized construction by conducting a site inspection, issuing notice, and concluding proceedings within two months; petition disposed of upon issuing this direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction to third respondent to dispose of petitioner's representation within fifteen days after site inspection and conclude proceedings within two months.

K.R.Shivaa Kumar Vs State rep. by Secretary to — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.02.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.No.2663 of 2017

¶7

K.R.Shivaa Kumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State, rep. by
Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu
Housing and Urban Department
Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 011.
2. The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Buildings
Chennai.
3. The Executive Engineer
Zone 8, Ward 95
Corporation of Chennai
Chennai-49.
4. Elango ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing respondent 2 and 3 to remove the illegal, unauthorised construction put up by the 4^th respondent based on the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2016.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.Ganesh Ram For Respondents : Mrs.Vasudha Thiyagarajan Additional Government Pleader for 1^st respondent

¶10

Mr.A.Nagarajan for respondents 2 and 3

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶14

On hearing learned counsel for parties, it is directed that the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2016 be disposed of by the third respondent after causing an inspection of the site within fifteen days of the receipt of the order and in case unauthorized construction is found to take action in accordance with law after notice to all concerned and conclude the proceedings within a period of two months thereafter.

¶15

The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.2619 of 2017 is closed.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To:
1. The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu
Housing and Urban Department
Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 011.
2. The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Buildings
Chennai.
3. The Executive Engineer
Zone 8, Ward 95
Corporation of Chennai
Chennai-49.
+1cc to Mr.A.Nagarajan, Standing Counsel for
Corporation of Chennai, S.R.No.6849
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.7111

¶17

W.P.No.2663 of 2017 KJ(CO) CA(13/02/2017)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.R.Shivaa Kumar v. State rep. by Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.R.Shivaa Kumar v. State rep. by Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.T.Praveen Kumar Vs The Sub Collector

T.G.Gopinath Vs the Tahsildar

Marina Square Flat Owners Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Vishal Krishna Vs Tamil Film Producers Council

Mr.M.E.Raja, President, Vs The Inspector General of

Edwin Rajesh, Vs The Collector of Krishnagiri