In this writ petition under Article 226, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous, noting that the respondent had complied with the Order of the Information Commissioner during the pendency of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.02.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.24515 of 2013
K.M.Shaik Naveeth
...Petitioner
Versus
The Public Information Officer, 26-B, Azeez Street, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Salem Dvision, Salem. .. Respondent
Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to comply the order dated 13.02.2013 passed by the State Information Commissioner.
Pursuant to the pendency of the Writ Petition, the respondent has passed the order in No.76/12/B2/Namakkal, dated 21.05.2012. Therefore, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it is open to the petitioner to file appeal before the appropriate forum.
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
The Public Information Officer, 26-B, Azeez Street, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Salem Dvision, Salem.
+1 cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari Advocate sr 11387
W.P.No.24515 of 2013
sks(co)
aa09/03/2017
K.M.Shaik Naveeth
The Public Information Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
