Writ petition challenging Central Administrative Tribunal order restraining direct absorption of employees into Group 'C' posts without framing Recruitment Rules. Bench dismissed the petition finding no merit in the challenge to the administrative order.
Writ petition dismissed with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on : 13.04.2017
Delivered on: 25.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
W.P.No.23404 of 2006 and
M.P.No.1 of 2006
1.N.G.Arumugham
2.M.Kaliamurthy
3.G.Passoupathy ...Petitioners
vs.
1.R.Chandrasekar
2.Union of India, rep.by Government of Pondicherry,
Through the Secretary to Government
for Community Development,
Chief Secretariat, Pondicherry.
3.Project Director,
District Rural Development Agency,
Pondicherry.
4.S.Nedunchezhian
5.B.Velmurugan
6.V.Govindan
7.A.Venkatachalam
8.V.Kichenamourthy
9.A.Desilnghu
10.G.Venkatachalam
11.S.Abimanar
12.Victor Mary Rubin
13.G.Subramani
14.K.M.Attancareane
15.P.Ranganathan
16.T.Rajendran @ Raja
17.K.Govindarasu
18.K.Ramanathan
19.M.Chakrapani
20.S.Arjunan
21.A.Pakrisami
22.S.Murugesan 23.S.Murugaian 24.S.narayanasamy 25.K.Ganapathy 26.S.T.Selvarasu 27.J.Srinivasan 28.M.Nargunan 29.R.Kuppuraman 30.G.Elayaperumal 31.A.V.ramachandran 32.S.Gnanasundaram 33.S.Natarajan 34.V.Ramakrishnan 35.K.J.Venkatachalapathy 36.V.Viswanathan 37.A.Sampathy 38.S.Malayan 39.R.Durairaj 40.G.Chandramohan 41.M.Kaliaperma 42.S.Vijayalakshmipathy 43.S.Sankaralingam 44.M.Subramanian 45.V.Natarajan 46.P.V.Subramanian 47.P.Sivagnanam 48.K.Maran 49.A.Mani 50.K.Mani 51.M.V.V.Bhasakarro 52.Vijayaarunachalam 53.P.Rangaraj 54.B.Ganesan 55.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Rep. by its Registrar ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 55th respondent in respect of order dated 06.10.2005 in O.A.No.346 of 2005 and to quash the same.
For Petitioners: Mr.Ajayakumar For Respondents: Mr.R.Syed Mustafa
Special Govt.Pleader for R2 and R3 R1,4 to 55 : Not Ready Notice
O R D E R
K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.
This writ petition is directed against the order dated 6 October, 2004 in O.A.No.346 of 2004, injuncting the second respondent from absorbing the petitioners and respondents 4 to 54 directly to the Group 'C' Post without framing Recruitment Rules or holding selection through Staff Selection Commission.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
svki
To
1.The Government of Pondicherry,
Through the Secretary to Government for
Community Development,
Union of India, Chief Secretariat, Pondicherry.
2.Project Director,
District Rural Development Agency,
Pondicherry.
3.The Registrar.
The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench.
+1cc to Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.24964
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.25515
W.P.No.23404 of 2006
RSI(CO)
RS(08/05/2017)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether rejection of claim to Group 'C' post without framing Recruitment Rules was unlawful.
Whether petition could be allowed against the Tribunal order restraining direct absorption.
If dismissal of writ petition was appropriate as contended.
N.G. Arumugham
M. Kaliamurthy
Union of India
Project Director, District Rural Development Agency
K.K. Sasidharan
M.V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
