Petitioner sought writ directing completion of pending disciplinary proceedings. Court dismissed petition as infructuous due to endorsement made by petitioner's counsel, imposing no costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24-10-2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.22283 of 2014
And M.P.No.1 of 2014
J.Jeysree .. Petitioner -vs1.The Transport Commissioner, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the disciplinary proceedings pending against the petitioner pursuant to the charge memo issued by the second respondent in R.No.A.2/25233/2011 dated 31.1.2013. For Petitioner - Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondents - Mr.A.Raja Perumal, Additional Government Pleader.
ORDER
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1 cc to the Govt Pleader sr75722
WP 22283 of 2014
aa17/11/2017
J.Jeysree
The Transport Commissioner, Chennai
The Regional Transport Officer, Hosur
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
