The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking the quashing of an order and reliefs for a gun licence because the petitioner withdrew the petition and it was disposed of without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.21730 of 2011
& M.P.No.1 of 2013
Y.Prakash ...Petitioner
Versus
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records in pursuance of the First Respondent's impugned order in R.A.5(2)/48519/2009 A.A.No.72/09, dated 10.05.2011 and quash the said order and consequently direct the respondents to grant Gun/Pistol licence to the petitioner immediately.
For Petitioner : M/s.P.Anand For Respondents : Mr.S.Navaneethan, AGP O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
+1cc to Government Pleader sr.10302
W.P.No.21730 of 2011
& M.P.No.1 of 2013
kj1(co)
ss(28/02/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Y. Prakash
State of Tamil Nadu
District Collector
D. Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
