Per curiam order dismissing a writ petition for lack of compliance with an interim order condition by efflux of time.
The Writ Petition is disposed of; the Department is free to proceed if needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 12.07.2017
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam
Writ Petition No.19902 of 2004
M/s.Tectonics
...Petitioner
Vs.
and Religious Endowments, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
...Respondents
Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records of the first respondent, in the impugned proceedings, R.C.No.946/C4/A3, dated 29.06.2004, and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/s.Radhika Chandrasekar
For Respondents : Mr.K.Venkatesh
Government Advocate
Heard M/s. Radhika Chandrasekar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr.K.Venkatesh, the learned Government Advocate for the respondents.
clear, as to whether the conditional order has been complied with or not. Thus, by efflux of time, nothing further survives in this Writ Petition for adjudication, and, it would be sufficient to observe that, it is open to the Department to proceed in accordance with law, if still a need arises to do so. No costs.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (J)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1. The Commercial Tax Officer,
Valluvarkottam Assessment Circle,
Chennai.
2. The Secretary to Government,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
Department of Commercial Taxes,
and Religious Endowments,
Fort St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.
+1cc to Special Government Pleader sr.49131
Writ Petition No.19902 of 2004
GJII(co)
ss(4/8/2017)
M/s. Tectonics
The Commercial Tax Officer
The State of Tamil Nadu
T.S. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
