Dismissed

S.Malarvizhi v. The State Commissioner for

Madras HC27 Jan 2017WP/1959/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner challenged interference with her tea bunk shop. The Court held that a Vending Committee had been constituted and directed the petitioner to approach it for a license instead of seeking a writ, thus dismissing the petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. The petitioner is directed to approach the Vending Committee for obtaining the license.

S.Malarvizhi Vs The State Commissioner for — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.No.1959 of 2017

¶7

S.Malarvizhi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State Commissioner for Differently Abled,
State Commissioner for Differently Abled,
J.N. Ring Road,
Chennai-600 078.
2. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai-600 003.
3. The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery,
Chennai-600 007. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus
directing the second respondent, their men, officials, servants
from in any manner interfering with the running of the
petitioner tea bunk shop at Chennai Muffsil Bus Terminus, Rural
Bus Exist Arch (Opposite to K-10 Koyambedu Police Station),
Koyambed, Chennai-600 107, wherein selling tea, coffee and
allied foods pursuant to the representation 26.10.2016.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthick Sevugapperumal For Respondents : Ms.Vasudha Thiagarajan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R3

¶9

Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran for R2

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶13

In view of the Vending Committee having been constituted vide G.O. (4D) No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016 and the proceedings of the Commissioner of Corporation in RDC.No.007/2016, dated 1.11.2016 nominating the members of the Vending Committee, we are not inclined to maintain the writ petition and it is for the petitioner to approach the Vending Committee for obtaining the license.

¶14

The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No
costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To:
1. The State Commissioner for Differently Abled,
State Commissioner for Differently Abled,
J.N. Ring Road,
Chennai-600 078.
2. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai-600 003.
3. The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery,
Chennai-600 007.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.5264
W.P.No.1959 of 2017
SK(CO)
CA(02/02/2017)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Malarvizhi v. The State Commissioner for

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Malarvizhi v. The State Commissioner for

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.R.Raswamy@Traffic Ramaswamy Vs Mrs.Chitra

E.Shanmugavelu Vs Thiru.Dr.Ratan Kumar Sinha

V.Raghavachari Vs

R.Nagarajan, Vs The Divisional Security

M/S.Brown Stone Foundation Vs a.Geetha

P.Paulraj, S/o.Pitchaikani, Vs The Secretary to Home