The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed these writ petitions as infructuous. The petitions, filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of specific sales tax orders, became infructuous based on submissions by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGANANAM
W.P.Nos.18718 to 18720 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.22358 to 22360 of 2004
Tvl.Madras Suspension Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director Ligi George, 32, Workshop Road, Madurai. .. Petitioner in all W.Ps'
Vs.
The Commercial Tax Officer,
Tamil Sangam Road Assessment Circle, Madurai. .. Respondent in all W.Ps'
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuing a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the respondent in Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax No.4900611/2003-2004 dated 17.03.2004, 20.05.2004 and 26.04.2004 respectively and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh (In all W.Ps') For Respondents : Mr.K.Venkatesh, (In all W.Ps') Government Advocate.
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that these Writ Petitions have become infructuous.
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
vsm
To
The Commercial Tax Officer, Tamil Sangam Road Assessment Circle, Madurai.
W.P.Nos.18718 to 18720 of 2004
AR(III)
VR(02/08/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tvl.Madras Suspension Ltd.
The Commercial Tax Officer
T.S.Sivagananam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
