Disposed

Raman, S/o.Sarangan v. The Principal Secretary

Madras HC21 Sept 2017WP/18289/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of this writ petition filed under Article 226. It directed the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, afford a hearing opportunity, and pass orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks and pass appropriate orders after hearing interested parties.

Raman, S/o.Sarangan Vs The Principal Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 21.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

W.P.No.18289 of 2017

¶6

Raman .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs. 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, St.George, Fort, Chennai. 2. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 3. The District Collector, Vellore, Vellore District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore, Vellore District. 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirupathur, Vellore, Vellore District. 6. The Inspector of Police, Thirupathur Taluk Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. 7. The Inspector of Police, Thirupathur Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. 8. The Inspector of Police, Kandali Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. 9. The Inspector of Police, Kurslapatu Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. 10. The Inspector of Police, Jolarapatai Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. .. Respondents

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 4^th respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 18.01.2017 within stipulated period in accordance with law.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Satish Kumar

¶11

For Respondents : Mr.D.Vairamoorthy Spl. Govt. Pleader.

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This petition is filed for a direction to the 4^th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.01.2017.

¶14

By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶15

In view of the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, there shall be a direction to the 4^th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.01.2017 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

While disposing of the said representation, the respondent shall afford an opportunity to the persons, whoever may be interested in the issue involved in the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶17

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Asst.Registrar (CS VIII)

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

gya

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, St.George, Fort, Chennai.

¶25

The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

The District Collector, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶28

The Superintendent of Police, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶29

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirupathur, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶30

The Inspector of Police, Thirupathur Taluk Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶31

The Inspector of Police, Thirupathur Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶32

The Inspector of Police, Kandali Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶33

The Inspector of Police, Kurslapatu Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶34

The Inspector of Police, Jolarapatai Town Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District.

¶35

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶36

+1cc to Mr.M.Satish Kumar, Advocate in sr.no.70447

¶37

W.P.No.18289 of 2017

¶38

GJ(CO) NR 26/10/2017

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Raman, S/o.Sarangan v. The Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raman, S/o.Sarangan v. The Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Thirunavukkarasu, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Senthamilan, Aged 25 Years, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Ark.Shanmugam Vs the Commissioner of Police

Roshan Kuruvilla Thomas Vs Arihant Invesments by

N. Sivanesan, Vs the State Rep. by Inspector

M/s.Kaleeswari Vs The State rep.by Deputy