20.The writ petitioner is still in service of the Chennai Port Trust. May be, if he were to be found to have made a wrongful claim, as to how the case of the writ petitioner should be dealt with at that stage, would be a matter which the Chennai Port Trust will have to deal with. Before any such aspects are dealt with by it, it needs a reasonable authentic platform and basis to undertake any such exercise. Hence, it is obvious, referred the certificate produced by the petitioner on 22 nd December, 1983, issued by the then Thasildar, Tirupattur, Vellore District, for verification. It is not as if that the writ petitioner's claim as a member belonging to Scheduled Tribe would be automatically shut out. The Scrutiny Committee is bound to put him on notice, which they have done already. The writ petitioner is entitled to produce the materials which are available in his support. If he can satisfy the Scrutiny Committee that his claim is a genuine one, there is nothing more for the writ petitioner to prove thereafter. If on the contrary, it emerges that he made a wrongful claim and on that basis secured any special benefits, it would be for his employer to deal with him thereafter. Therefore, there is no way, he can seek for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to refrain/forbear the respondents 1 & 2 from verifying the genuineness of his claim.
