Ms.P.Mullai v. The Chairman cum Managing
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a charge memo via writ petition under Article 226. The Court observed that the petition could not be entertained without a point of jurisdiction. Upon this view, the counsel withdrew the petition, and the Court allowed the withdrawal along with closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn and the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No cost.