Remanded

E.Selvakumari v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 May 2017WP/17421/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction under Article 226 to direct respondents to consider an application for issuance of patta for a purchased plot. The court directed the Tahsildar to consider the application and pass orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 26.12.2013 and pass orders on merits within twelve weeks.

E.Selvakumari Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 09.05.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

WP.No.17421 of 2014

¶6

E.Selvakumari .. Petitioner
Versus
1. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
at Kancheepuram.
2. The Tahsildar,
Sholinganallur Taluk,
at Sholinganallur, Chennai-119 .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of
India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing
the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated
26.12.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Muniratnam for M/s.A.Ramu
For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhanajeyan, SGP
O R D E R
The present writ petition is filed for a direction to
consider the petitioner's application dated 26 th December, 2013
for issuance of patta in respect of the plot purchased by her
bearing plot No.22 to an extent of 1174.5 sq.ft. comprised in
Survey No.131 in Kazhiveli Salai, now known as V.P.K.Salai,
Perungudi Village, the then Tambaram Taluk, now Sholinganallur
Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

In respect of the same location, more specifically in respect of plot No.19 purchased by K.Harikrishnan, this Court passed an order on 07.04.2017 in WP.No.23664 of 2014. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that similar relief may be granted in this writ petition also.

¶9

Accordingly, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's application dated 26.12.2013 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶10

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶11

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AT
To
1. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
at Kancheepuram.
2. The Tahsildar,
Sholinganallur Taluk,
at Sholinganallur, Chennai-119
+1cc to Mr.A.Ramu, Advocate, S.R.No.36984
WP.No.17421 of 2014
MP(CO)
CS/26/05/17

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

E.Selvakumari v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Selvakumari v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Muralidharan, Vs the District Collector

C. Krishnamurthy Vs the Commr. Hr & Ce

K.Perumal Vs the Special Tahsildar

M.Balraj Vs the Life Insurance Corporation

G.Iyanar Vs The District Collector

P.M.Krishnakumar Vs the Registrar