Writ petition seeking direction to fix seniority list was dismissed by the High Court as not pressed by the petitioner who had endorsed acquiescence.
None. Petition dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.09.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.17413 of 2004
N.K.Kalidasan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, 8, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to fix the seniority list for the promotion of Assistant Planner from Planning Assistant Grade I as per MMDA Service Regulations, 1980.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is
not pressing the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that
effect.
2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Index : No http://www.judis.nic.in Internet : Yes
07.09.2017
2
va
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
va
To
The Member Secretary,
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
8, Gandhi Irwin Road,
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
W.P.No.17413 of 2004
07.09.2017
N. K. Kalidasan
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
M. DURAISWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
