Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one- or two-line order where the learned standing counsel for the respondent informed the court that the petitioner's grievance regarding electrical service connection has been redressed. The court accepted this position and dismissed the writ petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
No further relief granted; writ petition dismissed with no costs. Lead
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.05.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.16048 of 2004
Mrs.Lakshmi N. Murthy
...Petitioner
-Vs-
The Superintending Engineer (South), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Kodambakkam, Chennai - 24.
...Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent and authorities functioning under him to receive the application of the petitioner for supply of Electricity, consider the same and direct effecting regular supply of Electricity on residential tariff basis to the various units of the petitioner building at Old No.23, Elango Adigal Street, Padmanabha Nagar, Choolaimedu, Chennai 600 094 without insisting upon the production of the completion certificate from the Corporation of Chennai in the light of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding electricity supply remains unresolved for adjudication or has been redressed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs. Lakshmi N. Murthy
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer (South), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Coram
S.M. Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court