Dismissed

Lalitha Rani, v. The General Manager

Madras HC14 Jul 2017WP/15923/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to direct banks to provide loan data, return title deeds, and refund excess charges. The court did not adjudicate merits but directed the bank to furnish details within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Bank to furnish loan account details within two weeks; prayer for immediate return of documents and payment stayed.

Lalitha Rani, Vs The General Manager — Consumer Protection | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14/7/2017

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and The Honourable Ms.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶5

Writ Petition No.15923 of 2017
S.Lalitha Rani ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The General Manager
Indian Bank
Corporate office, PB No.5555
254-260 Avvai Sanmugam Salai
Royapettah
Chennai 14.
2.The Chief Manager
Indian Bank
No.225 Trunk Road
Porur Branch
Chennai 87.
3.The Ombudsman
The Reserve Bank of India
Kamarajar Salai
Chennai 1. ... Respondents

¶6

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 20/3/2017 and to direct the first and second respondents to provide the entire statement of loan account No.471616761 & 471617164 from the date of the loan to till the date and further to return bank the original title deeds of the petitioner and No due due certificate and also to pay back the excess amount collected from the petitioner in connection with the above mentioned loan accounts.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhusudanan For Respondents : Mrs.S.R.Sumathy for R.R.1 and 2 For Respondent No.3 : No Appearance

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J)

¶11

Petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents, to consider the representation, dated 20/3/2017 and to direct the first and second respondents, to provide the entire statement of loan account Nos.471616761 & 471617164 and to return the original title deeds and No due certificate and also to pay back the excess amount collected from the petitioner, in connection with the above mentioned loan accounts.

¶12

Without going into the merits of the case, when the
prayer was put across to the learned counsel appearing for the
Bank, Mrs.S.R.Sumathy, submitted that details relating to the
loan account Nos.471616761 & 471617164, would be furnished,
within two weeks, from today. As of now, we are not granting
any direction, to return the original documents and to pay the
excess amount, if any, collected from the petitioner.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for the respondent Bank, this writ petition is
disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mvs
To
1. The General Manager
Indian Bank
Corporate office, PB No.5555
254-260 Avvai Sanmugam Salai
Royapettah
Chennai 14.
2. The Chief Manager
Indian Bank
No.225 Trunk Road
Porur Branch
Chennai 87.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

The Ombudsman The Reserve Bank of India Kamarajar Salai Chennai 1.

¶15

+1cc to Mrs.S.R.Sumathy, Advocate, S.R.No.49485 +1cc to Mr.S.Madhusudanan, Advocate, S.R.No.49787

¶16

W.P.No.15923 of 2017

¶17

CS IV CA(02/08/2017)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Lalitha Rani, v. The General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalitha Rani, v. The General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Kamatchi Envelops, Vs Corporation Bank

Bright N Power Marketing Pvt. Vs the Authorised Officer

Mr.R.Arumugasamy Vs Authorized Officer

M/s.Jyothi Laboratories Ltd., Vs Indian Overseas Bank

Mrs.Krishnaveni Vs The Authorized Officer

M/s.Jerin Poly Bags, Vs The Registrar