Disposed

Autocom Industries v. Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Madras HC16 Jun 2017WP/15072/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondent to dispose of pending refund applications within four weeks. Relying on a prior decision regarding input tax credit reversal, the Court ordered the Assessing Officer to hear the petitioner and pass an order on the refund application within the specified period.

What did the court decide?

The Assessing Authority shall pass an order on the petition for refund within four weeks, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Autocom Industries Vs Assistant Commissioner(Ct) — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:16.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P.No.15072 of 2017

¶6

Autocom Industries, rep. by its Managing Partner S.Manivannan ... Petitioner

¶7

Assistant Commissioner (CT), Ambattur Assessment Circle, Station No.127, Yadhaval Street, Padi, Chennai-600 050. ... Respondent

¶8

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the refund applications filed and pending before the respondent in their letter 20.03.2017 filed on 25.04.2017 for refund of tax amount of Rs.2,45,396/- for the year 2013-14 and Rs.3,13,680/- for the year 2014-15 in total amounting to Rs.5,59,076/- and order for refund in Form-p along with Refund Voucher for the same as per Rule 8(6) of TNVAT Rules 2007 in a time bound manner for refund of tax.

¶9

This writ petition prays for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the refund applications filed and pending before the respondent in their letter 20.03.2017 filed on 25.04.2017 for refund of tax amount of Rs.2,45,396/- for the year 2013-14 and Rs.3,13,680/- for the year 2014-15 in total amounting to Rs.5,59,076/- and order for refund in Form-p along with Refund Voucher for the same as per Rule 8(6) of TNVAT Rules 2007 in a time bound manner for refund of tax.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Heard Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶12

The petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, Act, 2006. Upon receipt of a notice from the respondent requiring the reversal of such ITC invoking the proviso to Section 19(2)(v) of the TNVAT Act 2006, the credit availed was reversed under protest. Thereafter, a request was filed dated 20.03.2017 seeking refund of the credit reversed on the ground that the proviso applied only to traders and not manufacturers that is pending disposal. It is not in dispute that the issue involved in this matter is covered by a decision of this Court reported in [2017] 100 VST 158 (Mad) in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, it is for the Assessing Authority to decide on the application for refund in the light of the order passed by this Court in 100 VST 158.

¶13

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The Assessing Officer shall pass an order on the petition for refund dated 20.03.2017 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. No costs.

¶14

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS VI) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar

¶15

¶16

Assistant Commissioner (CT), Ambattur Assessment Circle, Station No.127, Yadhaval Street, Padi, Chennai-600 050.

¶17

+1cc to M/s.Special Government Pleader(Taxes),sr.42706

¶18

+1cc to M/s.N.Murali,Advocate sr.42857

¶19

W.P.No.15072 of 2017

¶20

nr(co) ss(20/6/2017)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Autocom Industries v. Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Autocom Industries v. Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment & Vs Mrs.Yogita Ravindra Gaikwad

Sundram Finance Limited Vs K.Sasi Kumar

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment & Vs Mr.Basant Sahu

Pravisal Projects Private Ltd. Vs Union of India

M.R.Anandan Vs Southern Railways

G.a.Projects Pvt.Ltd. Vs Kamarajar Port Ltd.