Allowed

M/S.Asahi India Safety Glass v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Madras HC7 Dec 2017WP/13042/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed two writ petitions filed by M/s.Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd. challenging the levy of Additional Sales Tax and penalty following a Division Bench decision that exempted sales cannot form part of taxable turnover.

What did the court decide?

Writs of Certiorari issued; impugned order dated 31.10.2008 quashed; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

M/S.Asahi India Safety Glass Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.12.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

M/s.Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd., Rep by its Authorised Signatory Mr.R.Kalaiselvan 76 to 81, SIPCOT Industrial Park Irungattukottai-602 105.

¶6

...Petitioner in both

¶7

The Commercial Tax Officer Sriperumbudur Asst Circle Varadharajapuram-602103.

¶8

... Respondent in both

¶9

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records of the respondent in TNGST/1661420/2002-03, 2003-2004 and quash the impugned order dated 31.10.2008 as passed against the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1970 and G.O.Ms.16 CT&RE dated 12.1.1998-Not.No.II(1)/CTRE/15/98 Gazette dated 4.2.1998 effective from 1.10.1998 to 30.09.2012 and G.O.Ms. No.381 dated 15.9.1997 respectively.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar in both For Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai in both Additional Government Pleader

¶11

Heard Mr.P.Rajkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents.

¶12

2.These writ petitions have been filed challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 31.10.2008 levying Additional Sales Tax.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the legal issues involved in the writ petitions squarely covered with the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench in the case of HSI Automotives Ltd. Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by the Commercial Tax Officer, Chennai in Tax Case (Revision) No.92 of 2014 dated 16.09.2015.

¶15

4.One of the question which was framed for consideration before the Division Bench is as follows:-

¶16

"(b)that once the sale of certain goods made to a certain buyer is exempt from the levy of both sales tax and additional sales tax, such sale may be included in the total turnover, but not in the taxable turnover, as otherwise, the purpose of exemption would be lost."

¶17

5.The above question was answered by the Division Bench on the following lines in favour of the Assessee :

¶18

"40.Therefore, on the first question of law, we are of the considered view that the Tribunal committed an error of law in treating the exempted sales effected by the petitioners to M/s.Hyundai Motors India Limited, as part of the 'taxable turnover' of the petitioner for the purposes of Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1970. Consequently, the levy of penalty was wrong and the second question has also to be answered in favour of the petitioner."

¶19

6.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent does not dispute the above legal position.

¶20

7.Thus, following the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench, these writ petitions are allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶21

maya

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

¶24

The Commercial Tax Officer Sriperumbudur Asst Circle Varadharajapuram-602103.

¶25