Disposed

E.Adimoolam, v. The Managing Director

Madras HC25 Jan 2017WP/12892/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition mandamus directing the second respondent to execute a sale deed. Court directed the second respondent to consider a representation and execute the deed within one month of receipt.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2016 and complete the execution of the sale deed within one month of receipt.

E.Adimoolam, Vs The Managing Director — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 25.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No.12892 of 2016

¶6

E.Adimoolam .. Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Managing Director,

¶9

Tamil nadu Slum Clearance Board,

¶10

No.5, Kamarajar Salai,

¶11

Chennai – 600 005

¶12

The Secretary cum Works Manager

¶13

Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai,

¶14

Chennai – 600 005

¶15

The Administrative Engineer, Tamilnadu Slum Clearnace Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai,

¶16

Chennai – 600 005. .. Respondents

¶17

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent herein to execute the sale deed, measuring about 75.60 square meter, situated at Plot No.194, MKB Nagar, Ambattur, Chennai – 53 in favour of the petitioner herein within the period fixed by thisCourt.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Elumalai

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabu

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner has submitted that after filing of the writ petition, the respondents asked the petitioner to pay the additional stamp duty, which has also been complied with.

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that if the petitioner has complied with the payment of additional stamp duty, they are ready and willing to execute the

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

sale deed.

¶25

In view of the submission made by both sides, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.03.2016, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such receipt of the same, the said exercise shall be completed within a period of one month thereafter.

¶26

In view of the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS III )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
kkd
To
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil nadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Chennai – 600 005
2. The Secretary cum Works Manager
Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Chennai – 600 005
3. The Administrative Engineer,
Tamilnadu Slum Clearnace Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Chennai – 600 005.

¶28

+1cc to Mr.S.Prabhu, Advocate SR.No.4765.

¶29

W.P.No.12892 of 2016 KJI(CO) GN(16/02/2017)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

E.Adimoolam, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Adimoolam, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Sitharthan, Vs The District Registrar

R.Ashok, Vs The District Collector

R.Anitha, Vs The Chief Secretary to

Tharag Aquua Products Vs The Secretary to Government

Mr.Bhuvaneshwaran Vs The Senior Regional Manager

Kalaivani Vs Senthilkumar