Disposed

Chinnakolanthaiyammal v. The District Collector

Madras HC25 Oct 2017WP/10387/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed for police protection while laying boundary stones. The Court did not grant the specific relief sought but granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent police with a proper representation after giving notice to interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the third respondent police for police protection by filing a proper representation, subject to a 4-week timeline to consider the matter after notice.

Chinnakolanthaiyammal Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.10.2017

¶3

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶4

W.P.No.10387 of 2016

¶5

Chinnakolanthaiyammal

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The District Collector,
Tiruvallur,
Tiruvallur District.
2.The Assistant Director,
Land Survey Department,
Tiruttani Taluk,
Tiruvallur District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Tiruttani Police Station,
Tiruvallur District.
4.Arumugam ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent herein to give police protection while Laying boundary stones situated in Survey No.262/2013 of an extent of 1.86 acres and 262/4 of an extent of 1.21 acres, totalling in all 3.07 acres in Ponpadi Village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District, pursuant to the representation dated 11.03.2016 given to the respondents.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr. T.Muruganantham For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhananjayan

¶11

Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent herein to give police protection while Laying boundary stones situated in Survey No.262/2013 of an extent of 1.86 acres and 262/4 of an extent of 1.21 acres, totalling in all 3.07 acres in Ponpadi Village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District, pursuant to the representation dated 11.03.2016 given to the respondents.

¶15

2.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the fourth respondent has created obstructions for laying boundary stones in the subject property.

¶16

3.Though the petitioner sought for a direction to the third respondent to extend police protection for the purpose of laying boundary stones in the property situated in Survey No.262/13 in Ponpadi Village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the third respondent Police to consider his representation dated 11.03.2016, for police protection.

¶17

4.In the result, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the third respondent police seeking for necessary police protection for the purpose of laying boundary stones in the subject property by filing proper representation. On receipt of such representation, the third respondent shall consider the same on its own merits, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent herein and any other person who may be interested, in accordance with law. Such an exercise will be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

5.With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

kal

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

¶26

2.The Assistant Director,
Land Survey Department,
Tiruttani Taluk,
Tiruvallur District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Tiruttani Police Station,
Tiruvallur District.
+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 75716
W.P.No.10387 of 2016
sai(co)
aa08/11/2017

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chinnakolanthaiyammal v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinnakolanthaiyammal v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Srivatsa Kengasubbiah Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

Jhonsirani Vs the Commissioner of Police

Usha Devi R.P., Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

P. Narayanasamy, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Sasi @ Sasikala, (50 Years) Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Arul Raj, M/a 40 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its