V.Jenitha, D/O. M.Vellapandi v. the Chief Educational Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Advocate C.V.Karthikeyan of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court admitted a review application filed in an appeal suit regarding land acquisition. The court directed the Government Advocate to appear and posted the matter for hearing via video conference.
What did the court decide?
Notice issued to Mr. R. Velmurugan, Government Advocate; matter posted for hearing on 12.12.2017.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
REV.APLC(MD) No.202 of 2017 IN
A.S.(MD)No.228 of 2015
GUBENDRAN ... REVIEW PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT-2
Vs
1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE(LAND ACQUISITION), PERIYAKULAM, NOW TALUK OFFICE, THENI. ... RESPONDENT-1/ APPELLANT
2 RAJAYYA ... RESPONDENT-2/ RESPONDENT-1 3 SEERANGAMMAL ... RESPONDENT -3/ RESPONDENT-3
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to review the judgment and decree of this Hon`ble Court dated 27.06.2017 made in A.S.(MD)No.228 of 2015 and restore the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2010 made in LAOP No.16 of 1998 on the file of the Sub Court, Periyakulam.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition should be admitted to restore the earlier judgment and decree.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GUBENDRAN
- respondent
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE(LAND ACQUISITION), PERIYAKULAM, NOW TALUK OFFICE, THENI.
- respondent
RAJAYYA
- respondent
SEERANGAMMAL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court