A writ petition filed by the Executive Officer against R. Chandrasekaran and six others was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel did not seek to press the petition.
Petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WMP No.104 of 2016
The Honble The CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honble Mr Justice M. SUNDAR
The Executive Officer, Kuttalam Town Panchayat, Kuttalam, Nagapattinam District Vs R.Chandrasekaran S/o.Rathinavel Pillai, No.20/20, Chettiyar Koil North Street, Kuttalam, Nagapattinam District and 6 others.
In view of the disposal of the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner / the 5th respondent does not seek to press this petition.
Petition, thus, stands dismissed as not pressed.
[CJ] [M S J]
24/01/2017
SRA
The Executive Officer, Kuttalam Town Panchayat
R. Chandrasekaran and 6 others
The Chief Justice
The Hon`ble Mr Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
