Dismissed

B.Nagesh, v. the Deputy General Manager

Madras HC13 Jul 2017WA(MD)/631/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This intra-court appeal questions the dismissal of a writ petition against a bank employee's transfer due to surplus staff. The Single Judge had upholding the transfer as legal. Noting the employee's subsequent transfer to a nearby branch, the High Court dismissed the appeal as unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed. No costs awarded.

B.Nagesh, Vs the Deputy General Manager — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :13.07.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

W.A.[MD].No.631 of 2014 and M.P.[MD]No.1 of 2014

B.Nagesh

... Appellant

Vs.

1.The Deputy General Manager (B&O), State Bank of India,

¶10

Network II, Administrative Cluster,

¶11

No.2, Ambedkar Road,

¶12

Madurai-2.

¶13

2.The Regional Manager, RBO-II, Regional Business Unit, No.2, Ambedkar Road,

¶14

Madurai-2. 3.The Chief Manager, State Bank of India,

¶15

NO.282, Madurai Road,

¶16

Virudhunagar. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER : Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed by the Learned Judge in W.P (MD).NO.16168 of 2013 and M.P(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 dated 30.10.2013.

¶18

Prayer in WP(MD). 16168/ 2013 :

¶19

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned Order of transfer by deployment passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings RM-II-11 dated 26.09.2013 and quash the same as illegal.

¶20

For Appellant :Mr.C.Jeganathan

¶21

For Respondents:Mr.S.Sethuraman

¶22

JUDGMENT

¶23

*************

¶24

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.]

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The unsuccessful writ petitioner is on appeal, questioning the order dated 21 October 2013, dismissing W.P.(MD) No.16168 of 2013.

¶26

¶27

2.The said writ petition was filed by the appellant herein questioning the order of transfer by deployment passed by the second respondent herein vide proceedings dated 26 September 2013. By the said order impugned in the writ petition, the writ petitioner had been transferred from Virudhunagar Branch State Bank of India to Parthibanur Branch.

¶28

3.The learned Single Judge held that on account of staff becoming surplus, the Management was entitled to take recourse to redeployment. Transfer is an incident of service. The allegation of malice against the Management was negatived. Finding no merit in the writ petition, the writ petition was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the employee filed the instant intra court appeal.

¶29

4.It is stated that during the pendency of the appeal proceedings, the appellant herein had been transferred from Parthibanur Branch to Sattur Branch, which is quite near to Virudhunagar.

¶30

5.Taking note of the reasoning set out in the order of the learned single Judge and the subsequent development viz., transfer of the writ petitioner to Sattur Branch, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶31

Sd/Assistant Registrar(crl side)

¶32

/ True Copy \

¶33

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶34

¶35

1.The Deputy General Manager (B&O), State Bank of India, Network II, Administrative Cluster, No.2, Ambedkar Road,Madurai-2.

¶36

2.The Regional Manager, RBO-II, Regional Business Unit, No.2, Ambedkar Road, Madurai-2. 3.The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, NO.282, Madurai Road,Virudhunagar.

¶37

+1 cc TO MR.S.SETHURAMAN, ADVOCATE,SR NO.65505

¶38

Arul/skm

¶39

MAS-MR-KKR/SAR2:28.07.2017:2P-5C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

W.A.[MD].No.631 of 2014 and M.P.[MD]No.1 of 2014 13.07.2017

B.Nagesh, v. the Deputy General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Nagesh, v. the Deputy General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary to Government, Vs Thiru.K.Krishnan

A.Sundar Vs State of Tamil Nadu

T. Thenmohan, Vs M/S. Kovilpatti Bar

P. Annakkodi, Vs the District Collector

S. Balasubramaniyam, Vs the Tahsildar

The Director General of Police Vs M.Arun