Dismissed

G.Chakkaravarthi, v. the Directorate General of

Madras HC8 Aug 2017WA(MD)/32/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed the writ appeal filed by a Sub Inspector of Police challenging the rejection of his application to correct his date of birth in the service register. The Court held that since the application was made 17 years after joining, the State was justified in rejecting it as it must be filed within 5 years of service.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeal and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.

G.Chakkaravarthi, Vs the Directorate General of — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.08.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.A(MD)No.32 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015

G.Chakkaravarthi

... Appellant

Vs.

1.The Directorate General of Police, Department of Police, Chennai – 600 004.

¶9

2.The Commissioner of Police, SIT CBCID, No.293, M.K.N.Road, Alanthur, Chennai – 16.

¶10

3.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: This Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to allow the writ appeal and set aside the order dated 21.11.2014 made in W.P.(MD) No.18850 of 2014 on the file of this Court.

¶12

Prayer in WP(MD). 18850/ 2014 :

¶13

To issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order issued by the 1st respondent in his proceedings RC.No.30093/NGB.V(1)/2012 dated 12.3.2013 and quash the same and further direct the respondents to change the date of birth of the petitioner as 29.7.1970 instead of 14.5.1969 in his service register.

¶14

For Appellant : Mr.A.Thirumurthy For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan

¶15

Special Government Pleader.

¶16

¶17

[Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ]

¶18

The unsuccessful writ petitioner is on appeal challenging the order dated 21.11.2014 made in W.P.(MD) No.18850 of 2014.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

2. The case of the appellant is that he was appointed in the Police Department as Sub Inspector of Police in the year 1996. His

¶21

¶22

date of birth was wrongly entered as 14.05.1969. Actually his real date of birth is 29.07.1970. Since he came to know his real date of birth only in the year 2013, he moved the respondents seeking to change the date of birth as 29.07.1970 instead of 14.05.1969 in his service register. The first respondent by order dated 12.03.2013 rejected the said application on the ground that it has not been filed within 5 years from the date of entering the service. The said order was sustained in WP(MD)No.18850 of 2014. Aggrieved by the same, this intra Court appeal has been filed.

¶23

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

¶24

4.The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the first respondent was not justified in summarily rejecting his application.

¶25

5.We are not impressed with this argument. Admittedly, the writ petitioner joined in service in the year 1996. The application for change in his date of birth was made only in the year 2013. 17 years had gone by in the meanwhile. An application for alteration of date of birth must be submitted within 5 years from the date of his service. That being so, the first respondent was justified in summarily rejecting the request for alteration of date of birth when it was lodged 17 years after entering service. The learned Single Judge was right in dismissing the writ petition and sustaining the order impugned in the writ petition. We find no merit in this writ appeal. It stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶29

To:

¶30

1.The Directorate General of Police,

¶31

Department of Police,

¶32

Chennai – 600 004.

¶33

2.The Commissioner of Police,

¶34

SIT CBCID,

¶35

No.293, M.K.N.Road,

¶36

Alanthur, Chennai – 16.

¶37

3.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.

¶38

+1cc to Mr.A.THIRUMURTHY Advocate in SR. No. 71203 SKM

¶39

JS/SV.MMR/SAR.1/21.09.2017/2P-5C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

W.A(MD)No.32 of 2015 08.08.2017

G.Chakkaravarthi, v. the Directorate General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Chakkaravarthi, v. the Directorate General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangamuthammal, Vs the Assistant Divisional

V.Mathiyas Vs the District Colletor

A.Sukumaran, Vs the District Collector

Natarajan Vs the Branch Manager

A.Kaviyarasan, Vs the Director of Panchayat

R.Mari Vs the District Library Officer