Writ appeal filed challenging the single-judge order dated 01.07.2014 dismissing a petition seeking quashing of a sale notification. Court held no substantive matter remains for adjudication due to subsequent developments and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.A(MD)No.1188 of 2014 and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014,C.M.P(MD)No.12538 of 2016 and 2618 of 2017
V.Chinnaya
.. Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 01.07.2014 passed in W.P(MD)No.9178 of 2009 by the learned Single Judge.
Prayer in WP(MD). 9178/ 2009 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARI, calling for the records relating to the Sale Notification No.Tha.Tho.Mu.Ka.Tiruchi 08/2009-10 of the 1st Respondent herein published in Dina Thanthi issue dt. 26-08-2009 and quash the same in so far as it relates to the property comprised in old survey No.185/2A and new Survey No.185/2A 10 of an extent of 50 Cents and the building thereon in Ambumedu, Kannudaiyanpatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.S.Suresh
J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.]
This Writ Appeal has been directed against the order dated 01.07.2014 passed in W.P(MD)No.9178 of 2009 by the learned Single
2
Judge.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/petitioner submits that in pursuant to the subsequent development, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter and a request has been made seeking leave to approach the respondent corporation.
3.In view of the same, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as nothing survives for adjudication, with liberty to the appellant/petitioner to approach the respondent corporation, if so, advised. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-I)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
SMN
TE/JC/SAR-II : 19/07/2017 : 2P/4C
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)No.1188 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014, C.M.P(MD)No.12538 of 2016 and 2618 of 2017 11.07.2017
V. Chinnaya
Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited
M.M. Sundresh
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
