Intra court appeals regarding writ petitions concerning electricity supply arrears were declared infructuous and dismissed following an endorsement by appellants' counsel indicating no substantive issues survived for adjudication.
The intra court writ appeals were dismissed as infructuous and no costs awarded. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.11.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.A.Nos.335 and 336 of 2010 And M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2010
S.Martin ... Appellant in W.A.No.335 of 2010 V.Anjaneyalu ... Appellant in W.A.No.336 of 2010 Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board represented by its Chairman No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle Metro, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Coimbatore – 641 102. 3.Akshaya Textiles Limited, represented by its Manager Mr.Veerendrappa ... Respondents in both W.As.
Common Prayer: Writ appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside and reverse the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No.1773 of 2010 dated 05.02.2010 disposing the same with directions and dismiss the same with exemplary costs.
WP.1773/2010:Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issua a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to pay the arrears of Rs.51,50,217/- vide his letter No.SE/CEDC/M/DFC/AO/R/HT/AS/A2 /HTSC 89/10 dated 13.1.2010 in 24 equal monthly installments along with the current consumption charges every month and restore supply on payment of the 1st installment.
For Appellants : Mr.R.Srinivas
in W.A.No.335 of 2010 Mr.J.Chandren Sundar in W.A.No.336 of 2010
For Respondents: Mr.S.K.Rameshuwar for R1 and R2 Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj for R3
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.)
The learned counsel for the appellants made an endorsement indicating that nothing survives for adjudication in view of the subsequent events.
2.In view of the endorsement so made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the intra court appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pri To 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board represented by its Chairman No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle Metro, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Coimbatore – 641 102.
W.A.Nos.335 and 336 of 2010 And M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2010 VGII(CO) GN(27/11/2017)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.Martin
V.Anjaneyalu
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Superintending Engineer, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle Metro
Akshaya Textiles Limited
K.K.SASIDHARAN
P.VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
